• Senator Conroy: the Internet is not special

    Apr 1 2010, 12:04

    In The Age this morning Senator Stephen Conroy, the Minister responsible for the Government’s plan to censor the Internet, repeated his mantra that the Internet is not special:

    Senator Conroy also brushed aside concerns from leading academics and technology companies that the plan to block a blacklist of “refused classification” (RC) websites for all Australians was an attempt to shoe-horn an offline classification model into a vastly different online world.

    “Why is the internet special?,” he asked, saying the net was “just a communication and distribution platform”.

    “This argument that the internet is some mystical creation that no laws should apply to, that is a recipe for anarchy and the wild west. I believe in a civil society and in a civil society people behave the same way in the physical world as they behave in the virtual world.”

    Newton said this was a “gross oversimplification”, pointing out that Australia Post and Telstra’s telephone network were also distribution platforms but were not censored.

    “Why should the internet, a distribution platform for all manner of intangibles, be censored as if it was a movie theatre? It makes no sense, the model doesn’t fit,” he said.

    Read more here.  The article quotes several other experts who disagree with Senator Conroy’s statement that the Internet is not special, including Associate Professor Bjorn Landfeldt, Greens Senator Scott Ludlam and EFA Vice-Chair Colin Jacobs.

    Senator Conroy also dismissed all criticism of his policy as “misleading information” spread by “an organised group in the online world”.  Greens Senator Scott Ludlam quite rightly debunked this assertion:

    “To characterise sustained opposition by individuals and groups as diverse as EFA, Google, SAGE, Yahoo, Save the Children, Reporters without Borders, Justice Kirby, Choice Magazine, leading online academics and industry associations and the United States Department of State as ‘an organised group in the online world’ is a remarkably naive misreading of how unpopular this proposal is,” Senator Ludlam said.

    Read more here.

    http://openinternet.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://openinternet.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_32.png http://openinternet.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_32.png http://openinternet.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://openinternet.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/newsvine_32.png http://openinternet.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_32.png http://openinternet.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://openinternet.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_32.png http://openinternet.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://openinternet.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/mixx_32.png http://openinternet.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png

  • 7 Comments

    1. Ben says:

      Of course the Internet isn't special….after all, it's just a series of tubes!

    2. smythh_rj says:

      If nothing else all this should clearly show that Mr Conroy does not know enough about what he is passing laws on. Which I guess just makes him another politician.

    3. subpixel says:

      The internet currently _is_ special; if it were not, then he wouldn't be doing anything to try to change it. You cannot change the reality of something just by saying something different. What he means to say is that he doesn't want the internet to be special, or he doesn't think it should be special. What makes it special at the moment is it doesn't generally) suffer from a few millennial of arbitrary rules based on superstition, insecurity and outright domination. If Conroy doesn't think the internet is special in some way, I don't trust him to bring anything good of the national broadband network… What is that to be – nothing special? If the only objective is to make these different technologies and modes of communication equal, bring the rest of them into the 21st Century; don't drag us all back to the middle ages.

    4. AkiraDoe says:

      It's funny, when he is talking about Internet Censorship,

      the "Internet is just a distribution platform" and "isn't special",

      but when he is trying to sell the NBN (another policy created without Industry consultation) the Internet is about,

      "This is about a revolution in healthcare, this is about a revolution in education, this is about a revolution in the way that businesses communicate with each other."

      http://abc.gov.au/news/stories/2009/07/15/2625979…

      Conroy, pick and angle and stick with it, you can't have it both ways.

    5. I think that stance taken by the senator is the most frustrating aspect of this whole. If there was an acknowledgment of the difficulties and unique qualities of online content it would open the debate up much more.

      As it stands he's just burying his head in the sand.

      I wrote up a short response on my website to the Radio National interview last week on my site; http://www.riddip.com

    6. CY says:

      As I suspected – Conroy has no intention of paying attention to anyone else's point of view on this. Waste of time having submissions on this policy, as he's already deleted all of them from his inbox.

      The taxpayer is going to fork out $44 million to block 355 out of over 1 trillion URLs on the web so that children don't "accidentally" stumble across them.

      What a total waste of money.

      When's the last time anyone "accidentally" stumbled across child porn? Only people who go LOOKING for it will ever actually find it.

      They would be better off using the money buying up hundreds of thousands of copies of NetNanny or CyberPatrol and distributing them for free to parents, and teaching them how to use it.

    7. Exceptional page and even quick to help you comprehend justification. Exactly how can As i continue acquiring concur to help you place part belonging to the guide inside new newssheet? Getting right credit standing you that journalist and even backlink with the internet site won’t even be a concern.

    POST A COMMENT

    (required)
    (will not be published - required )