-
EFA Media Release: Internet users support education over mandatory Internet filtering
Feb 22 2010, 2:33Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA) today welcomed the results of a recent survey that found Australian Internet users do not support the idea of mandatory Internet filtering.
The preliminary results of the Australian Broadband Survey 2009, conducted by Whirlpool (whirlpool.net.au), found that 91.8% respondents did not support the idea of mandatory Internet filtering.
The survey also found 83.4% of respondents said that the introduction of mandatory Internet filtering might affect their vote at the next Federal election.
“The results highlight widespread community disagreement with the Government’s plan,” said Peter Black, EFA’s campaign manager. “These results also show that Australians believe the Government would be better off focusing on increased education and law enforcement, instead of an impractical and costly policy of Government censorship.”
When asked what the Government should focus on in terms of internet safety, 81.8% supported educating parents, 63.9% said educating children, 43.7% said law enforcement, 42.1% said subsidising desktop filter software, and 33.5% said subsidising ISP-level opt-in filters, with only 3.2% supporting mandatory Internet filtering.
These preliminary results from the Australian Broadband Survey 2009 only include respondents aged 18 years of age or older. The survey was successfully completed and verified 21,775 times by respondents aged 18 years of age or older. The full results of the Survey are expected to be published soon.
“These results confirm that people who understand the issue overwhelming oppose the Government’s policy,” Black said. “The big challenge now is to win the hearts and minds of ordinary Australians, who perhaps aren’t particularly computer or Internet savvy.”
That is why last week EFA launched the Open Internet campaign, centred around a new website, OpenInternet.com.au, blog and Facebook fan page, to, to, that together will act as campaign hub for all the different individuals and organisations that are campaigning against the Governmentb s mandatory Internet filtering policy.
The Open Internet campaign marks an escalation of opposition to the Government’s policy, which will continue throughout the year. “Our goal is to ensure the Australian public know what they’re in for,” said Black. “It’s important that such a major and expensive policy gets the public scrutiny it deserves. And we believe that Open Internet portrays a positive and understandable message that will resonate with Australians who are yet to form a strong opinion on the Government’s policy.”
- Ends -
Below is:
- Background information
- Contact details for mediaBackground:
* EFA’s Open Internet campaign
- http://openinternet.com.au/* Electronic Frontiers Australia
- http://www.efa.org.au/* Australian Broadband Survey 2009 Pre-Release Report
- The pre-release report has been redacted. The full report will be available at Whirlpool (whirlpool.net.au) in the next few days.About EFA:
Electronic Frontiers Australia Inc. (EFA) is a non-profit national organisation representing Internet users concerned with on-line rights and freedoms. EFA was established in 1994, is independent of government and commerce, and is funded by membership subscriptions and donations from individuals and organisations with an altruistic interest in promoting online civil liberties.
Media Contacts:
Mr Peter Black
Campaign Manager
Phone: 0421 636 496
Email: pete.black at efa.org.auMr Colin Jacobs
EFA Vice-Chair
Phone: 0402 631 955
Email: cjacobs at efa.org.au













I am all for convincing the average Australian this filter needs to be stopped and will have dire consequences for both the voting public and their children, unfortunately however, I do not think a facebook group or blog will achieve anything. Whilst I understand and respect what the EFA are endeavoring to do, I question their ability to reach ‘everyday Australians’ and parents whose vote and voice is needed to help fight the cause. I am a mother of two, who has a daughter in primary school, and I vehemently oppose the filter, however when I raise the issue with other parents at the school or at my sons playgroup, I am either told ‘only people who support child porn would oppose the filter’ or get the vacant ‘oh yes, I don’t really know much about that, it doesn’t really effect me’. You need to make these people see how and why it does effect them and their children, give them real outcomes to ponder. I also venture to say that we need a non-geek (I use the term lovingly and coming from an IT background count myself partially among them) figurehead and non-geek consultants because I think right now the spokes people for the open internet campaign are in unchartered territory.parents at my daughter
Labor’s Pedophile ‘Honeypot’: Mandatory Internet filtering guarantees disaster for our children. We are all aware that the filtering technology is flawed, easily circumvented and not a ‘silver bullet’, as Mr Conroy put it. Until today, I had not heard anyone allude to ‘honeypots’ as this forum poster does: “With ISP l…evel filtering, all one need do is use any sort of proxy (i.e. Tor or web-based proxies) to access the blocked material, which is not only a very trivial thing to do but the technique is already common knowledge amongst teens who want to circumvent school network blocks on Facebook, MySpace, etc. Worse, many (if not most) of the free ‘MySpace’ proxies you can find through a simple Google search are ‘honeypots.’ Unscrupulous free proxy operators harvest usernames and passwords that are run through the system and exploit them to take over the Facebook, MySpace, Gmail or even internet banking accounts which are accessed through them. Free proxy sites also can serve up malware, installing trojans, keyloggers and other nasties on machines which access the proxy site, exploiting kids’ general ignorance of these hidden technical threats. As such, ISP level filtering both will give parents a false sense of security that children are actually limited from accessing age-inappropriate material and through honeypot and malware exploits, cause more problems than they solve.”
The immutable fact is that kids & teens WILL use these ‘proxies’ if Mr Rudd and Labor tries to censor the Internet. It is folly to suggest that this will not occur – and youngsters will swap proxies like we used to exchange bubblegum cards or marbles as children.
Mr Rudd’s solution is akin to the finger in the dyke before a tsunami hits – and the tsunami is millions of typically ‘rebellious’ youngsters who can already bypass filters with their eyes closed. It would be perilous to ignore the fact that many ‘honeypots’ are fronts for crime gangs, pedophile networks and indeed predators who set up virtual servers to lure their prey.
As if it is not bad enough that the filter has proven itself wholly ineffective against perverts, instead of tightening the net on pedophiles, we’re creating millions of additional trapdoors where ‘spiders’ patiently lay in wait for our kids. Allowing this mandatory Internet filtering legislation means we – well-intentioned people – are literally helping to push them toward the holes.
Ask yourself why groups such as ‘Save the Children’, ‘National Children’s Youth Law Centre’, ‘The Australian Library & Information Association’ and ‘Civil Liberties Australia’ are vehemently opposing mandatory Internet censorship. It’s not too late to voice your opposition to anything other than voluntary ‘opt-in’ filtering. The legislation is to be tabled this week.
Please write to Senator Julie Bishop today – [email protected] or Independent Senator Nick Xenephon [email protected]. Remember, if you’re not part of the solution … you are part of the problem.them to take over the Facebook, MySpace, Gmail or even internet banking accounts which are accessed through them. Free proxy sites also can serve up malware, installing trojans, keyloggers and other nasties on machines which access the proxy site, exploiting kids’ general ignorance of these hidden technical threats. As such, ISP level filtering both will give parents a false sense of security that children are actually limited from accessing age-inappropriate material and through honeypot and malware exploits, cause more problems than they solve.”
The immutable fact is that kids & teens WILL use these ‘proxies’ if Mr Rudd and Labor tries to censor the Internet. It is folly to suggest that this will not occur – and youngsters will swap proxies like we used to exchange bubblegum cards or marbles as children.
Mr Rudd’s solution is akin to the finger in the dyke before a tsunami hits – and the tsunami is millions of typically ‘rebellious’ youngsters who can already bypass filters with their eyes closed. It would be perilous to ignore the fact that many ‘honeypots’ are fronts for crime gangs, pedophile networks and indeed predators who set up virtual servers to lure their prey.
As if it is not bad enough that the filter has proven itself wholly ineffective against perverts, instead of tightening the net on pedophiles, we’re creating millions of additional trapdoors where ‘spiders’ patiently lay in wait for our kids. Allowing this mandatory Internet filtering legislation means we – well-intentioned people – are literally helping to push them toward the holes.
Ask yourself why groups such as ‘Save the Children’, ‘National Children’s Youth Law Centre’, ‘The Australian Library & Information Association’ and ‘Civil Liberties Australia’ are vehemently opposing mandatory Internet censorship. It’s not too late to voice your opposition to anything other than voluntary ‘opt-in’ filtering. The legislation is to be tabled this week.
Please write to Senator Julie Bishop today – [email protected] or Independent Senator Nick Xenephon [email protected]. Remember, if you’re not part of the solution … you are part of the problem.
Hmm I never said my editing was perfect
Those are all very valid points. I can assure you we are consulting with non-geeks and trying to secure a few non-geek figureheads (or public faces) for the campaign. As the campaign rolls out over the coming weeks, we will hopefully do a better job at reaching "everyday Australians".